<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adaptation of the Week &#8211; the Insect Dorsal Ocelli</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/</link>
	<description>Musings on Nature, Science, Evolution, Biology, and Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:31:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Biochemical Soul &#187; Carnivalia! Evolution, Blue, Spineless, and Pro Publica</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3584</link>
		<dc:creator>Biochemical Soul &#187; Carnivalia! Evolution, Blue, Spineless, and Pro Publica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3584</guid>
		<description>[...] GrrlScientist also recently hosted the Circus of the Spineless #37 dedicated to the spineless creatures of the world - which included my post on insect dorsal ocelli. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GrrlScientist also recently hosted the Circus of the Spineless #37 dedicated to the spineless creatures of the world &#8211; which included my post on insect dorsal ocelli. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Science Pundit</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3543</link>
		<dc:creator>The Science Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3543</guid>
		<description>Very fascinaing post!

When I was a kid, I used to collect the molted shells that cicadas left behind.  I would use them to set up scenes (like battles, etc.)  Cicada shells and the noises the adults make always reminds me of childhood summers.

[nitpick]Sirius is the brightest star in the &lt;strong&gt;night&lt;/strong&gt; sky[/nitpick] ;-)

I find it kind of thrilling to try to imagine what it would be like to be able to see through compound eyes, or into the ultraviolet, or to discern light polarization, or to be able to make out shapes using echolocation, etc.  I agree that many of those would be almost (if not completely) impossible to imagine.  However, in defense of imagination, I would like to point out that many of our senses are already wired together in the subconscious and we don&#039;t realize it.  For example, our visual system is tied to our positional and balance systems.

Quick experiment: Tape a picture that has a definite up and down to the back of an empty box with the picture&#039;s up pointing towards the &quot;actual up&quot;.  Now rotate the box (and picture) clockwise.  You will see that the picture is no longer pointing up.  Now repeat that, but instead of rotating the box clockwise, rotate your head counterclockwise (through the same angle as before).  Even though your eyes are receiving the exact same stimulus as when the box was rotated, you will see that the picture is still pointing up.  This is because your brain combines the input of several senses to generate the world that you see.

So perhaps something similar is happening with the cicada&#039;s ocellus.  The information from the various eyes are sewn together into a single, seamless visual perception.  It&#039;s still hard to imagine, but it gives us a potential direction in which to explore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very fascinaing post!</p>
<p>When I was a kid, I used to collect the molted shells that cicadas left behind.  I would use them to set up scenes (like battles, etc.)  Cicada shells and the noises the adults make always reminds me of childhood summers.</p>
<p>[nitpick]Sirius is the brightest star in the <strong>night</strong> sky[/nitpick] <img src='http://biochemicalsoul.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I find it kind of thrilling to try to imagine what it would be like to be able to see through compound eyes, or into the ultraviolet, or to discern light polarization, or to be able to make out shapes using echolocation, etc.  I agree that many of those would be almost (if not completely) impossible to imagine.  However, in defense of imagination, I would like to point out that many of our senses are already wired together in the subconscious and we don&#8217;t realize it.  For example, our visual system is tied to our positional and balance systems.</p>
<p>Quick experiment: Tape a picture that has a definite up and down to the back of an empty box with the picture&#8217;s up pointing towards the &#8220;actual up&#8221;.  Now rotate the box (and picture) clockwise.  You will see that the picture is no longer pointing up.  Now repeat that, but instead of rotating the box clockwise, rotate your head counterclockwise (through the same angle as before).  Even though your eyes are receiving the exact same stimulus as when the box was rotated, you will see that the picture is still pointing up.  This is because your brain combines the input of several senses to generate the world that you see.</p>
<p>So perhaps something similar is happening with the cicada&#8217;s ocellus.  The information from the various eyes are sewn together into a single, seamless visual perception.  It&#8217;s still hard to imagine, but it gives us a potential direction in which to explore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biochemical Soul » Adaptation of the Week - Channichthyidae Icefish Blood and Antifreeze</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3510</link>
		<dc:creator>Biochemical Soul » Adaptation of the Week - Channichthyidae Icefish Blood and Antifreeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3510</guid>
		<description>[...] Previous Adaptations of the Week: Insect Dorsal Ocelli [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previous Adaptations of the Week: Insect Dorsal Ocelli [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beetles In The Bush</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3323</link>
		<dc:creator>Beetles In The Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3323</guid>
		<description>Ah, someone who understands why I continually refer to &quot;my beloved Ozarks&quot;.

Thanks for adding me to your link list, and I&#039;ll do likewise.  You can thank Adrian Thysse for introducing us to each other.

regards--ted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, someone who understands why I continually refer to &#8220;my beloved Ozarks&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thanks for adding me to your link list, and I&#8217;ll do likewise.  You can thank Adrian Thysse for introducing us to each other.</p>
<p>regards&#8211;ted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beetles In The Bush</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>Beetles In The Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>You might get some conflicting opinions about this.  Some will argue that the Hemiptera is the order of the &quot;true bugs&quot;, thus, cicadas, hoppers, aphids, etc. are now true bugs.  Others will argue that the term &quot;true bugs&quot; should now be reserved for the suborder Heteroptera, which contains all of the former Hemiptera excluding the &quot;homopterans&quot;.  I see both viewpoints but tend to go with the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might get some conflicting opinions about this.  Some will argue that the Hemiptera is the order of the &#8220;true bugs&#8221;, thus, cicadas, hoppers, aphids, etc. are now true bugs.  Others will argue that the term &#8220;true bugs&#8221; should now be reserved for the suborder Heteroptera, which contains all of the former Hemiptera excluding the &#8220;homopterans&#8221;.  I see both viewpoints but tend to go with the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irradiatus</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Irradiatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>Glad you found me, Ted.
FYI - I also originally hail from the lovely Ozarks (Arkansas side - Benton County).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you found me, Ted.<br />
FYI &#8211; I also originally hail from the lovely Ozarks (Arkansas side &#8211; Benton County).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irradiatus</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3316</link>
		<dc:creator>Irradiatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3316</guid>
		<description>What!?

All the Homopterans are now Hemipterans?

I guess the order of the &quot;true bugs&quot; is a little bigger now. Is that correct? Can I call cicadas true bugs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What!?</p>
<p>All the Homopterans are now Hemipterans?</p>
<p>I guess the order of the &#8220;true bugs&#8221; is a little bigger now. Is that correct? Can I call cicadas true bugs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beetles In The Bush</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3314</link>
		<dc:creator>Beetles In The Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3314</guid>
		<description>Great post - I just found you through &lt;a href=&quot;http://evolvingwithdarwin.blogspot.com/2009/03/my-sunday-best-15-march-2009.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Evolving Complexity&lt;/a&gt;.

Incidentally, the order Homoptera is no longer - consumed by the Hemiptera (apparently the auchenorrhynchans [hoppers and cicadas] are more closely related to the &quot;old&quot; Hemiptera than they are to the sternorrhynchans [aphids, scales, whitefiles, etc.]).

regards--ted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; I just found you through <a href="http://evolvingwithdarwin.blogspot.com/2009/03/my-sunday-best-15-march-2009.html" rel="nofollow">Evolving Complexity</a>.</p>
<p>Incidentally, the order Homoptera is no longer &#8211; consumed by the Hemiptera (apparently the auchenorrhynchans [hoppers and cicadas] are more closely related to the &#8220;old&#8221; Hemiptera than they are to the sternorrhynchans [aphids, scales, whitefiles, etc.]).</p>
<p>regards&#8211;ted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrodoSaves</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3308</link>
		<dc:creator>FrodoSaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3308</guid>
		<description>Excellent post! Very well written. I wonder what that little fella thought of your camera as you loomed in for the snap. &quot;What a marvelous convex lens! Such mysteries as cicadian photography cannot hope to explain!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post! Very well written. I wonder what that little fella thought of your camera as you loomed in for the snap. &#8220;What a marvelous convex lens! Such mysteries as cicadian photography cannot hope to explain!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parag</title>
		<link>http://biochemicalsoul.com/2009/03/adaptation-of-the-week-the-insect-dorsal-ocelli/comment-page-1/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>Parag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biochemicalsoul.com/?p=1188#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>Incredibly fascinating and some beautiful pictures to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredibly fascinating and some beautiful pictures to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
